Monolith vs Microservices Architecture — Which One Is Right for You?
Monolithic software versus microservices architecture is a highly disputable topic. You might want an easier workflow for your developers and choose monolith or break down the system into independent working blocks by choosing microservices. To start with, consider what each type of architecture means. Monolithic software has a unified structure, incorporating all the modules, storage routines, UI/UX, business logic, etc. Its advantages include minimum code duplication, higher efficiency due to a simpler data storage and memory utilization, and lower expenses. Among its disadvantages are the difficulty to isolate specific tasks like code support, complexity of dependencies and side-effects, and limited availability of tools due to the use of a single technological stack for the entire system. Microservices is an interconnected mesh of simple operation blocks, each able to be launched independently. Its advantages are specificity, flexibility, improved independent scaling, and functionality distribution, which means that fewer coding mistakes will be made. The disadvantages involve needs to establish communication between the services, support multiple databases and storages, complex testing and deployment, and higher overall costs. To make the right choice when considering monolith and microservices for your project, think about your area of expertise, the scope of talents available in your team, the data sharing system in your company, and the amount of risk you’re ready to take.
